How not to reconvert an atheist
Mar. 6th, 2009 01:28 pmAs I mentioned a couple years back, the LA Times' religion editor lost his faith and wrote a few articles about the experience. He's recently expanded these to a whole book, and he's gotten a lot of fan-mail from Christian readers helping to pull him back into the fold. Here's his response.
He remains a "reluctant" atheist and (as I said at the time) I never found his reason for giving up Christianity very compelling, but his essay still has an interesting perspective (and a few funny bits).
He remains a "reluctant" atheist and (as I said at the time) I never found his reason for giving up Christianity very compelling, but his essay still has an interesting perspective (and a few funny bits).
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 12:42 am (UTC)I think that depends on when the choice is made. A child who is indoctrinated from birth didn't make the choice to believe. He or she may later choose NOT to believe. Choosing to continue believing changes nothing, especially when considering that not believing is more risky.
Did that make sense? I haven't had enough chocolate yet today.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 01:13 am (UTC)Perhaps, but maybe that makes the person's faith explicit, when before it was implicit. It promotes it to 'real' faith as opposed to some ingrained reflexes taught to a receptive and uncritical child.
I don't really have a dog in this hunt, I was just trying to show that Aaron's position and Lobdell's are not necessarily that far apart.